3/30/2013

သတင္းေကာင္းး



မတ္လ ၂၄ ရက္၊ ၂၅ ရက္ေန႔ ရက္စြဲေတြနဲ႔ အာ ရပ္ သတင္းဌာန တခုျဖစ္ တဲ့ ARAB NEWS မွာ ေဖာ္ျပထားခ်က္အရ ေဆာ္ဒီအာေရဗ်ႏိုင္ငံသည္
ျမန္မာျပည္က လူ ၅ သိန္းနီးပါးကို ဒုကၡသည္ေတြ အျဖစ္ အသိအမွတ္ျပဳၿပီးေနထုိင္ခြင့္ေပးမယ္လို႔ ေဆာ္ဒီ မင္းသား Khaled Al-Faisal က  မကၠာအနီးက ကူဒုိင္းမွာက်င္းပတဲ့ အခမ္း အ နား တခုမွာ ေျပာၾကား လုိက္ပါ တယ္ ဆိုတဲ႕သတင္းကို ကမၻမေၾက ဘေလာ့မွ ၀မ္းေျမာက္၀မ္းသာ ႀကိဳဆိုလိုက္ပါတယ္။
“က်ေနာ္ မကၠာ အုပ္ခ်ဳပ္ေရးမႉးတာ၀န္ရလာၿပီးတဲ့ေနာက္ ဘုရင္ အဗၺဒူလာဆီကို က်ေနာ္တင္ျပခဲ့တဲ့ ပထမ ဆံုး အဆုိျပဳခ်က္ ပါ” လုိ႔ ေဆာ္ဒီမင္းသား Khaled က ေျပာေၾကာင္းARAB NEWS က ဆိုသည္။
ဘုရင္ အဗၺဒူလာက မကၠာမွာ ျပန္႔က်ဲေနတဲ့ အဆုိပါ ခရိုင္ အတြင္းေနထုိင္ေနသူ ျမန္မာမြတ္ဆလင္ေတြရဲ႕ အေျခအေန တုိးတက္ေစဖုိ႔ ၀န္ႀကီးဌာနနဲ႔ ဆိုင္တဲ့ ေကာ္မတီတခု ဖြဲ႔ဖုိ႔ကိုပါ အမိန္႔ ထုတ္ျပန္ခဲ့ပါတယ္လုိ႔ လည္း မင္းသား Khaled က ေျပာေၾကာင္း မကၠာေဒသ ခရုိင္တြင္းမွာ တုိးတက္မႈေတြ ျဖစ္ေစဖုိ႔ အိမ္ ယာသစ္မ်ား တည္ေဆာက္ ရံုသာမကအလားတူ အဲဒီမွာေနထုိင္ေနၾကတဲ့လူေပါင္း ၄ သိန္းက ၅ သိန္းထိ ကိုလည္း ျပန္လည္ ျပဳစု ပ်ိဳးေထာင္ေပးမွာျဖစ္တယ္” လို႔ မင္းသား Khaled က ရွင္းျပ ပါတယ္ဟု ဆိုသည္။ ေဆာ္ဒီအစုိးရက ေဆာ္ဒီေရာက္ ျမန္မာမြတ္ဆလင္ လူ႔အဖြဲ႔အစည္းကို က်န္းမာေရး၊ လူမႈေရး၊ ပညာေရး စတဲ့ က်ယ္ျပန္႔တဲ့ အစီအစဥ္ေတြ ေထာက္ပံ့သြားဖုိ႔ ရွိတယ္လုိ႔လည္း သိရပါတယ္။ 

ေဆာ္ဒီဘုရင္ Faisal လက္ထက္ မွာ ၁၉၅၀ အေစာပိုင္းကစၿပီး ရိုဟင္ဂ်ာေတြကို အစုလိုက္အျပဳံလိုက္ လက္ခံၿပီး အျမဲတမ္း ေနထိုင္ခြင့္ေပးခဲ့တာ အခုဆို ႏွစ္သိန္းခြဲေလာက္ ရွိနိုင္ပါတယ္။ အဲဒီထဲမွာ မကာဘုရားဖူးဆိုၿပီး ဗီဇာနဲ႔ဝင္ မျပန္ဘဲ ခိုးၿပီးေနတဲ့ သူေတြလည္းအမ်ားအျပားရွိခဲ့သည္။ ပီးခဲ့ေသာႏွစ္မ်ားက  Faisal လက္ထက္က ဝင္ခြင့္ျပဳခဲ့တဲ့သူေတြနဲ႔ သူတို႔ရဲ့ မိသားစုေတြကိုေတာင္ ေဆာ္ဒီအစိုးရက ေနထိုင္ခြင့္ တိုးေပးဖို႔ျငင္းဆန္ေနပါတယ္။ ၂၀၀၉ မွာ ခိုးေနမႈအပါအ၀င္ ရာဇဝတ္မွုအမ်ိဳးမ်ိဳးနဲ႔ ေထာင္ထဲ မွာထည့္ထားတဲ့ ရိုဟင္ဂ်ာမိသားစု သုံးေထာင္ေလာက္ကို ေဆာ္ဒီက ႏွင္ထုတ္ဖို႔ အမိန႔္ခ်ေပမယ့္ ဘယ္ပို႔ရမလဲမသိ ျဖစ္ေနတာလဲ ရွိပါတယ္။
ေထာင္ထဲမွာမဟုတ္ဘဲ အခု လက္ရွိ မကၠာ၊ ဂ်က္ဒါနဲ႔ မဒီနာ ေဒသေတြမွာ ျမန္မာမြတ္ဆလင္ ၃ သိန္းခြဲေလာက္ ေနထုိင္ေနၾက တယ္ လို႔ သိရပါတယ္။ အရင္က တရားမ၀င္ေနထိုင္ၾကတာျဖစ္ၿပီး အခုေတာ့ တရား၀င္ ဒုကၡသည္ေတြ အျဖစ္ နဲ႔ ေနထိုင္ခြင့္ ရၾကေတာ့မည္ျဖစ္သည္။

ေလးစားခ်စ္ခင္ရေသာ ဘေလာ့ဂ္မိတ္ေဆြမ်ားခင္ဗ်ား က်ေနာ္သည္ မူလကပင္ ရွဴစရာ ေလမရွိ ေနစရာေျမမရွိေသာ ဘဂ၈ၤလားျမန္္မာ နယ္စပ္က ရိိုဟင္ဂ်ာမ်ားအတြက္  အရွင္ျမတ္၏ ေနမသ္မ်ားကို ခံယထိုက္သည္ဟု ယံုၾကည္သူျဖစ္ပါသည္။ ထိုေၾကာင့္ ယခုအခါ အလႅာဟ္အရွင္ျမတ္၏ ႏွစ္သက္မႈကို ရယူရန္ အီမာန္အျပည့္အ၀ျဖင့္ ေဆာင္ရြက္မႈကိုျပဳေသာ ေဆာ္ဒီ မင္းသား Khaled Al-Faisalအား ၀မ္းေျမာက္၀မ္းသာ ႀကိဳဆိုေထာက္ခံလိုက္ပါသည္။
 http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentid=20130329158963

3/24/2013

ဗိုက္ေဖာက္ခံရတဲ့ ဘုရား၊ ဘုမသိဘမသိကုလားနဲ႔ ေထာင္က်ခဲ့ရတဲ့သံဃာ

ယခု မိတၳီလာ အဓိကရုဏ္းေတြ ျမင္ရ၊ ေတြ႔ရ၊ ဖတ္ရေတာ့ ဟိုးလြန္ခဲ့တဲ့ ၁၉၉၉ မႏၱေလး၊ အိုဘိုေထာင္မွာ အတူေနခဲ့ရတဲ့ သံဃာေတာ္ သံုးပါးကို ျမင္ေယာင္မိသည္။ ဦးမေဟာ္သဓ၊ ဦးသံဝရ၊ ဦးေကသရ ။ ဒီသံဃာေတာ္ေတြက မဟာျမတ္မုနိ ဘုရားႀကီး ဝမ္းဗိုက္ေတာ္ အေဖာက္ခံရတဲ့ ကိစၥမွအစ ဗုဒၶဘာသာ၊ မြတ္စလင္ အဓိကရုဏ္းအလယ္၊ ေနာက္ဆံုး ပုဒ္မ ၅/ညနဲ႔ ေထာင္ (၇)ႏွစ္ မႏၱေလး၊ အိုးဘိုေထာင္တြင္ ဘဝကိုေပးဆပ္ၾကရေတာ့သည္။ ဒီသံဃာေတြထဲက မစိုးရိမ္တိုက္ေဟာင္းက ဦးဇင္း ဦးမေဟာ္သဓႏွင့္ ကၽြန္ေတာ္ တခန္းထဲ အတူေနခဲ့ရသည္။ အသားျဖဴျဖဴ မ်က္ခံုးထူထူ ၊ႏႈတ္ခမ္းမွာ ဘုသီးေလးနဲ႔ ပံုစံ ပုဆိုးကို သင္းပိုင္လိုလုပ္ဝတ္ၿပီး သကၤန္းကို တမ္းတတတ္ေသာ ဒီကိုယ္ေတာ္
 ေနာက္ေၾကာင္းေတြကို ျပန္ေျပာင္း ေျပာျပ ေတာ့  မ်က္ရည္ ပိုးပိုးေပါက္ေပါက္ ၾကၿပီး ေတာက္ေခါက္ခဲ့သည္။
--
မဟာျမတ္မုနိ ဘုရားႀကီးကို နဝတ လက္ထက္ အထက္လူႀကီးဆိုသူမ်ား အမိန႔္ျဖင့္ လူမသိသူမသိ ဝမ္းဗိုက္ေတာ္ေဖာက္တဲ့ကိစၥ ျဖစ္လာသည္။ တရက္၊ တရက္ႏွင့္ ရုပ္ပြားေတာ္ကို သကၤန္းေတာ္ျဖင့္ လႊမ္းထားသည္မွာ တပတ္ၾကာလာေသာအခါ မသကၤာစရာ ကိစၥျဖစ္ေနၿပီမို႔ မႏၱေလးသံဃာေတာ္မ်ား ရုပ္ပြားေတာ္ကို သကၤန္းဖယ္ရန္ ေတာင္ဆိုၾကသျဖင့္ ရုပ္ပြားေတာ္ကို ဗိုက္ေဖာက္ထားသည့္ကိစၥ ဘူးေပၚသလိုေပၚကာ မႏၱေလး တၿမိဳ႕လံုး သံဃာေတာ္မ်ားႏွင့္ ၿမိဳ႔ခံမ်ား မခံမရပ္နိုင္ျဖစ္ၿပီး ထိုကိစၥကို ျပဳလုပ္ခဲ့ေသာ တာဝန္ရွိသူမ်ားႏွင့္ ခြင့္ျပဳခဲ့ေသာ ဆရာေတာ္ႀကီးမ်ားအား တနိုင္ငံလံုးသိေအာင္ ေျဖရွင္းေပးရန္ ေတာင္ဆိုမႈမ်ား ျဖစ္လာေတာ့သည္။ ထိုကိစၥသည္ မရိုးမသားျပဳလုပ္ထားေသာ ကိစၥျဖစ္ေသာေၾကာင့္ နဝတ စစ္အစိုးရအေနျဖင့္ တနိုင္ငံလံုးသိေအာင္ တရားဝင္ ေျဖရွင္းျခင္းမွာ မျဖစ္နိုင္သမို႔ ထံုစံအတိုင္ ကုလား၊ ဗမာ အဓိကရုဏ္းကို ရုပ္လံုးေဖၚေတာ့သည္။

ဘုန္းႀကီးတူမကို ရွပ္ဖီးဆိုတဲ့ ကုလားက သားမယားျပဳက်င့္ၿပီး ဗုဒၶဘာသာကို ေစာ္ကားေမာ္ကားေျပာဆိုကာ ထိုကေလးမအား ရိုက္ႏွက္သည္။ ထို႔ေၾကာင့္ အမ်ိဳးဘာသာသာသနာအတြက္ ကုလားမ်ားကိုရိုက္၊ ဗလီမ်ားကို ဖ်က္ၾကဆိုၿပီး ျပႆနာႀကီးတခု ေပၚေပါက္လာကာ ဘုရားဗိုက္ေဖာက္သူ တရားခံမ်ားဆီမွ ျမွားဦးသည္ ဘုမသိဘမသိ ဘယ္ကမွန္းမသိတဲ့ ျဖစ္စဥ္ေၾကာင့္ ကုလားဘက္ ျမွားဦးလုည့္သြားေတာ့သည္။ မႏၱေလးမွသည္ ၿမိဳ႕အေတာ္မ်ားမ်ားကို ျဖတ္၍ ရန္ကုန္သို႔ေရာက္ေသာအခါ မႏၱေလးမဟာျမတ္မုနိဘုရားႀကီးအား ကုလားမ်ားက ဗိုက္ေဖာက္ၿပီး ေရႊမ်ား ခြာယူၾက သည္ဆိုသည္အထိ ခ်ဲ႕ကားမႈမ်ားျဖစ္လာၿပီး မႏၱေလး၊ ရန္ကုန္ အပါအဝင္ ၿမိဳ႕အေတာ္မ်ားမ်ားတြင္ ကုလား၊ဗမာ အဓိကရုဏ္းမ်ားျဖစ္ပြားခဲ့ရၿပီး။ ေသေၾက ပ်က္စီးမႈမ်ားျဖင့္ အဆံုးသတ္ကာ ဘုရားႀကီး ဗိုက္ေဖာက္သည့္ကိစၥ ေမွးမွိန္ေပ်ာက္ကြယ္သြားေတာ့သည္။

နဝတ စစ္အစိုးရသည္ ထိုမွ်ႏွင့္ အားရၿပီးဆံုးၿပီးဟု မထင္လိုက္ႏွင့္ မွားေပးလိမ့္မည္။ ဘုရားႀကီး ဝမ္းဗိုက္ေဖာက္တဲ့ကိစၥေဖၚထုတ္ရန္ ဦးေဆာင္ေသာ သံဃာမ်ားအား ဖမ္းဆီးေတာ့သည္။ ဦးေဆာင္သံဃာတပါးျဖစ္ေသာ ဦးမေဟာ္သဓလည္း စစ္ကိုင္း သံဃာေဆးရံုတြင္ နာမက်န္း၍ ေဆးကုသခံေနရာမွ ေထာက္လွန္းေရးမ်ား၏ ဖမ္းဆီးျခင္းကို ခံရေတာ့သည္။ စစ္ေၾကာေရးတြင္ ကုလား၊ ဗမာ အဓိကရုဏ္းကိစၥ ဟေတာင္မဟပဲ ဘုရားႀကီးကိစၥႏွင့္ ပတ္သက္ၿပီးသာ ရိုက္ႏွက္ ေမးျမန္း စစ္ေဆးခံခဲ့ရသည္။ စဖမ္းစဥ္ကာလထဲက သကၤန္းကို ဆြဲခၽြတ္ လူဝတ္လဲခိုင္းၿပီး ဖမ္းဆီး ေခၚေဆာင္လာကာ စစ္ေၾကာေရးစခန္းသို႔ အေရာက္တြင္ ဝိုင္းဝန္းထိုးႀကိတ္ ၾကသည္။ ဦးဇင္းကို ဒီလို ရိုင္းရိုင္းစိုင္းစိုင္း မဆက္ဆံပါနဲ႔ ေကာင္းေကာင္းေမးပါ မင္းတို႔ သိခ်င္တာ အကုန္ေျပာမယ္လို႔ ေျပာေတာ့ မင္းကခုထိ ဦးဇင္း လုပ္ေနတုန္းလားကြဆိုၿပီး စစ္ေထာက္လွန္းေရးမ်ားက ထိုးႀကိတ္တြန္းလွဲ၍ သိကၡာခ်ေပးမယ္ဆိုကာ ေခါင္းကို ေျခေထာက္မ်ားျဖင့္ ဝိုင္းနင္းၾကေတာ့သည္။ ဒီေလာက္နဲ႔ ဘယ္ရပ္ပ့ါမလဲ စစ္ေထာက္လွန္းေရးေတြပဲ။ ဦးဇင္း ဦးမေဟာ္သဓကို ေလးဘက္ေထာက္ခိုင္းၿပီး သူ႔ရဲ႕လူနာမည္ျဖစ္တဲ့ တင္ဝင္းဆိုတာကို အဆက္မျပတ္ ရြတ္ခိုင္းသည္။ ကၽြန္ေတာ္နာမည္ တင္ဝင္းပါ၊ ကၽြန္ေတာ္ နာမည္ တင္ဝင္းပါဆိုတဲ့ အသံ ရပ္လိုက္တာနဲ႔ ေနာက္က ေခါင္းကို ဖေႏွာက္ႏွင့္ ေပါက္တာခံရသည္။ ဒီလို တညႏွင့္ တမနက္ ေအာ္ေနခဲ့ရၿပီး စစ္ေမးသမွ်ေျဖခဲ့ရေသာ ဦးမေဟာ္သဓမွာ ခုႏွစ္ရက္ေျမာက္ေန႔ ေထာင္သို႔ ပို႔ခါနီး ေထာက္လွန္းေရးဗိုလ္ႀကီးက မင္းဘာေျပာစရာရွိလဲလို႔ ေမးေတာ့ ဦးဇင္းက စိတ္နာနာနဲ႔ မင္းတို႔ေကာင္ေတြ ဂ်ပန္စစ္ကင္ေပတိုင္ေတြနဲ႔ ဘာမွမထူးဘူးလို႔ ေျပာလိုက္ရာ အနာေပၚ တုတ္က် ေဒါသပုန္ထသြားၿပီး ရိုက္မည္ တကဲကဲျဖစ္ေနေသာ ဗိုလ္ႀကီးကို သူရဲေဘာ္မ်ားက ဆရာ စိတ္ထိန္း ေထာင္ပို႔ေတာ့ မွာဆိုၿပီး ဝိုင္းဆြဲၾကရသည္။ ျဖစ္ခ်င္တာျဖစ္ဆိုၿပီး ေျပာခ်င္တာေျပာလိုက္တာ ဘာမွမျဖစ္လို႔ ေတာ္ေသးတယ္ဟု စိတ္ထဲက ေတြးေနတုန္း ေထာင္ပို႔မဲ့ ေထာက္လွန္းေရး ကားေပၚအေရာက္ ခုဏက ေျပာတဲ့အေကာင္ ဘယ္ေကာင္လဲ ဆိုတဲ့အသံကို ၾကားလိုက္ရသည္။ ေခါင္းစြတ္နဲ႔မို႔ ဘာမွမေတြ႔ရ အသံလာရာကို နားစြင့္လိုက္ေတာ့ " ေဟ့ေကာင္ တသက္လံုးမွတ္ထား ဗမာစစ္ဗိုလ္ ကင္ေပတိုင္ကြ " ဆိုတဲ့ ဗိုလ္ႀကီးရဲ႕ ေျပာသံအဆံုး နားအံုတခုလံုး ေျဖာင္းကနဲဆိုတဲ့ အသံအတူ ပူထူမူးေနာက္သြားၿပီး ဘာေတြဆက္ျဖစ္တယ္မသိေတာ့ ေထာင္ေရာက္မွ သတိျပန္လည္ေတာ့သည္။

ေထာင္က တိုက္ခန္းက်ဥ္းေလးထဲမွာ ေဘးအခန္းက ဘယ္သူရွိလို႔ ရွိမွန္းလဲမသိရ၊ အျပင္လဲမထြက္ရ ကပ္ထားတဲ့ ကဒ္ျပားမွာ (၅)ည အခ်ဳပ္ဆိုတဲ့ စာတန္းေလးေတြလို႔ (၅)ည ေနရမယ္ပဲ ထင္ခဲ့တာ မနက္မနက္ ဆန္ျပဳတ္လာေဝေတာ့ ထည့္စရာ ဘာမွမရွိလို႔ ၾကြတ္ၾကြတ္အိပ္နဲ႔ ထည့္ေသာက္ (၅)ရက္ ျပည့္မဲ့ေန႔ကို ေစာင့္လိုက္တာ တပတ္ျပည့္လဲ မလြတ္ ႏွစ္ပတ္ျပည့္လဲ မလြတ္။ တရက္ေတာ့ ကုလားတေယာက္ အခန္းေပါက္ကို လက္အုပ္ခ်ီေရာက္လာၿပီး ဦးဇင္း ကၽြန္ေတာ္ ရွပ္ဖီးပါ ျဖစ္တဲ့ကိစၥ ကၽြန္ေတာ္လဲ ဘာမွမလုပ္ပါဘူး ရဲေတြလာဖမ္းၿပီး ေထာက္လွန္းေရးကိုပို႔တယ္၊ ေထာက္လွန္းေရးက မင္းေထာင္ထဲမွာ ခဏေနေနဆိုၿပီး ထည့္ထားတာပါ။ ကၽြန္ေတာ္နဲ႔ ျဖစ္တဲ့ကိစၥ ဘာမွ မဆိုင္ပါဘူး ဘာမွလဲမသိပါဘူး။ ဟိုဘက္ခန္းေတြက ဦးဇင္းေတြကို ဦးဇင္းပဲ ရွင္းျပေပးပါ ေနာက္ၿပီး ဒီဟာေတြကို ၾကည့္ေပးလိုက္ပါ ကၽြန္ေတာ္ ဟိုဘက္ထိသြားလို႔မရဘူး ဦးဇင္းက ထိပ္မွာမို႔လို႔ တန္းစီးကိုေျပာၿပီး လူအလစ္ခဏဝင္လာတာပါ ဘုရားဆိုၿပီး မုန္းၾကြတ္နဲ႔ စားစရာ တခ်ိဳ႔ေပးကာ အျမန္ျပန္ထြက္သြားေသာ ရွပ္ဖီးကိုၾကည့္ၿပီး ဦးဇင္း ခံျပင္းမိတယ္။ ဘာသာျခားက သူမွာ ရွိတဲ့ စားစရာကို ေတာင္းပန္တိုးလွ်ိဳး ၿပီးလာေပးေဖၚရေပမယ့္ တို႔ ဘာသာဝင္ေတြျဖစ္တဲ့ ေထာက္လွန္းေရးက သံဃာေတာ္ေတြကို ကိုထိလက္ေရာက္ေစာ္ကား၊ ေထာင္ အရာရွိနဲ႔ ဝန္ထမ္းေတြက ႏႈတ္နဲ႔ ေစာ္ကား တန္းစီးဆိုတဲ့ အက်ဥ္းသားေတြက ဆဲဆိုတာခံရတာ အသဲနာလိုက္တာလို႔ ေျပာၿပီး မ်က္ရည္တြင္တြင္က်ေနတဲ့ ဦးမေဟာ္သဓကို ၾကည့္ၿပီး နားေထာင္ေနတဲ့ ကၽြန္ေတာ္ သူနဲ႔အတူ မ်က္ရည္က်  ေတာက္ ေခါက္မိတယ္။
ေၾသာ္ ဦးဇင္းလဲ ေထာင္ထဲ (၇)ႏွစ္ျပည့္လို႔ ေထာင္ကလြတ္ၿပီး ဘယ္ဆီေရာက္ေနၿပီးလဲ တပည့္ေတာ္မသိေပမဲ့ သိေနတာကေတာ့ ဒီလူမ်ိဳးေရးဆိုတဲ့ ဝွက္ဖဲတခ်ပ္နဲ႔ အခါကာလမေရြး လွန္လွန္အစားခံေနရတာကိုေတာ့ျဖင့္ တပည့္ေတာ္ သိေနပါတယ္ဘုရား။ ။
------------------------------------------ MoeMaKa shared Thit Moe's status.
 
ခရက္ဒစ္- ကိုေသာင္းပုလဲေျမ။

3/22/2013


The 18th CPC Congress Special: Aung San Suu Kyi and Her Movement: Creations of US/West’s Corporate-financier Interests
Post Categories: Asia
Tony Cartalucci | Wednesday, September 26, 2012, 18:17 Beijing

The Queen of Corporate-Fascist Faux “Democracy”: Aung San Suu Kyi Goes to Washington and Exposes US “Democracy Promotion” as Corporate-Fascist Racket
Key Points:



Aung San Suu Kyi and her movement are creations of Western corporate-financier interests.
Suu Kyi has recently received a series of suspect “awards” from corporate-financier sponsored institutions.
Awarding institutions represent the antithesis of Suu Kyi’s alleged ideals of “democracy,” “freedom,” and “human rights.”
Suu Kyi’s movement has been recently exposed as genocidal bigots, which is perhaps the reason the US has staged this latest PR “awards” blitz.
Nothing could say “democracy” and “humanitarianism” less than big-oil’s Chevron, Exxon, BP, ConocoPhillips, or international financier criminals like Deutsche Bank, Blackstone, Barclays, Citigroup, or perhaps defense contractors and war profiteers EADS, General Dynamics, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, and Nazi collaborators IBM.
Professional propagandists like News Corporations (Fox News), Bloomberg, and Reuters, as well as public relations firms like Edelman, who make the vast criminal conspiracies of the above mentioned possible, also constitute the antithesis of “democracy promotion.”
Photo Above: Not the first shower of accolades – earlier this year Hague handed Suu Kyi the “Chatham House Prize.” Nothing quite says “democracy promotion” like a prize from an organization consisting of Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, BP, Exxon, Chevron, BAE, Boeing, Lockheed, and many more.
This, along with Suu Kyi’s more recent trip to the US equates to self-aggrandizing stunts the global elite pull to lend themselves otherwise non-existent legitimacy.
Indeed, the most obscene chapters in modern human history have been written by these corporate-financier interests who span nations, transcend “democratic elections,” trigger wars of aggression for profit and the projection of their own power under the guise of a myriad of lies and propaganda, while accumulating, each in their own right, a mountain of human rights atrocities against people all around the world – from the Niger Delta, to the rain forests of South America, to the ravaged and subjugated people of Iraq and Afghanistan, to the oil fields of Libya and even the Gulf of Mexico in North America.
They literally are the bane of humanity, the crux of all problems, the source of the peoples of the world’s torment, the architects of human misery on the grandest of all imaginable scales, unparalleled throughout all of human history.
So then, one must question the merits of receiving “awards” handed out by organizations sponsored by and representing the collective interests of such corporate-financier interests. Who, in good consciousness, could except such awards? Surely a useful idiot at best, a deceitful, dark emissary of their nefarious agenda at worst.
To fully appreciate the implications involved with the West’s celebrated “democracy champion” Aung San Suu Kyi receiving showers of awards during her recent visit to the United States, we must fully understand those doing the showering.
The National Endowment for Democracy 
The National Endowment for Democracy, despite the lofty mission statement articulated on its website, is nothing more than a tool for executing American foreign policy. Just as the military is used under the cover of lies regarding WMD’s and “terrorism,” NED is employed under the cover of bringing “democracy” to “oppressed” people.
However, a thorough look at NED’s board of directors, as well as the board of trustees of its subsidiary, Freedom House, definitively lays to rest any doubts that may be lingering over the true nature of these organizations and the causes they support.
Upon NED’s board of directors we first find John Bohn who traded petrochemicals, was an international banker for 13 years with Wells Fargo, and is currently serving as a principal for a global advisory and consulting firm, GlobalNet Partners, which assists foreign businesses by making their “entry into the complex China market easy.”
Surely Bohn’s ability to manipulate China’s political landscape through NED’s various activities both inside of China and along its peripheries constitutes an alarming conflict of interest. However, it appears “conflict of interest” is a reoccurring theme throughout both NED and Freedom House.
Bohn is joined by Rita DiMartino who worked for Council on Foreign Relations corporate memberAT&T as “Vice President of Congressional Relations” as well as a member of the CFR herself. Also representing the Fortune 500 is Kenneth Duberstein, a board member of the war profiteering Boeing Company, big oil’s ConocoPhillips, and the Mack-Cali Realty Corporation.
Duberstein also served as a director of Fannie Mae until 2007. He too is a CFR member as are two of the companies he chairs, Boeing and ConocoPhillips.




Image: A visual representation of the National Endowment for Democracy’s corporate-financier ties found across their Board of Directors. Far from “human rights advocates,” they are instead simply leveraging such issues to disguise what is in reality corporate-financier hegemonic expansion.




We then consider several of the certified warmongers serving upon NED’s board of directors including Francis Fukuyama, Zalmay Khalilzad, Will Marshall, and Vin Weber, all signatories of the pro-war, pro-corporate Project for a New American Century.
Within the pages of documents produced by this “think tank” are pleas to various US presidents to pursue war against sovereign nations, the increase of troops in nations already occupied by US forces, and what equates to a call for American global hegemony in a Hitlerian 90 page document titled “Rebuilding Americas Defenses.”
As we will see, this warmongering think tank serves as a nexus around which fellow disingenuous rights advocate Freedom House also gravitates.
The “Statement of Principles,” signed off by NED chairmen Francis Fukuyama, Zalmay Khalilzad, and Vin Weber, states, “we need to accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.”
Of course by “international order” they mean meddling beyond the sovereign borders of the United States and is merely used as a euphemism for global imperialism. Other Neo-Con that signed their name to this statement include Freedom House’s Paula Dobriansky, Dan Quayle (formally), and Donald Rumsfeld(formally), along with Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Eliot Cohen, and Elliot Abrams.
A PNAC “Statment on Post-War Iraq” regarding a wholehearted endorsement of nation-building features the signatures of NED chairman Will Marshall, Freedom House’s Frank Carlucci (2002), andJames Woolsey (formally), along with Martin Indyk (Lowy Institute board member, co-author of the conspiring “Which Path to Persia?” report), and William Kristol and Robert Kagan both of the warmongering Foreign Policy Initiative.
It should be noted that the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) is, for all intents and purposes, PNAC’s latest incarnation and just recently featured an open letter to House Republicans calling on them to disregard the will of the American people and continue pursuing the war in Libya.
The FPI letter even suggests that the UN resolution authorizing the war in the first place, was holding America “hostage” and that it should be exceeded in order to do more to “help the Libyan opposition.” Similar letters have been penned in regards to supporting armed terrorists versus Syria.
An untitled PNAC letter addressed to then US President George Bush regarding a general call for global warmongering received the seal of approval from Freedom Houses’ Ellen Bork (2007), Ken Adelman (also former lobbyist for Thailand’s Thaksin Shinawatra via Edelman), and James Woolsey (formally), along with Neo-Con degenerates Richard Perle, William Kristol, Robert Kagan, and the always disingenuous demagogue Daniel Pipes.
Other notable corporate-fascists populating NED’s board of directors include:
William Galston: Brookings Institution (board of trustees can be found on page 35 here).
Moises Naim: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (corporate funding here).
Robert Miller: corporate lawyer.
Larry Liebenow: US Chamber of Commerce (a chief proponent of SOPA), Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE).
Anne-Marie Slaughter: US State Department, Council on Foreign Relations (corporate members here), director of Citigroup, McDonald’s Corporation, and Political Strategies Advisory Group.
Richard Gephardt: US Representative, Boeing lobbyist, Goldman Sachs, Visa, Ameren Corp, and Waste Management Inc lobbyist, corporate consultant, consultant & now director of Ford Motor Company, supporter of the military invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003.
Marilyn Carlson Nelson: CEO of Carlson, director of Exxon Mobil.
Stephen Sestanovich: US State Department, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, CFR.
Judy Shelton: director of Hilton Hotels Corporation & Atlantic Coast Airlines.
It is safe to say that neither NED nor Freedom House garners within its ranks characters appropriate for their alleged cause of “supporting freedom around the world.” It is also safe to say that the principles of “democracy,” “freedom,” and “human rights” they allegedly champion for, are merely being leveraged to co-opt well meaning people across the world to carry out their own self-serving agenda.
Surely the value of any “award” they bestow upon champions of their “cause” equates to the management of public perception and the obfuscation of their true agenda.
The Atlantic Council 
The Atlantic Council claims to be a “preeminent, non partisan institution devoted to promoting transatlantic cooperation and international security.” It is partnered with NATO – representing the collective corporate-financier interests that drive NATO’s current existence, its agenda, and the direction it proceeds into the future with.
The board of directors includes a bi-partisan representation – revealing the truly singular agenda pursued by the corporate-financier elite merely under the guise of various false political paradigms. Board members include, Brent Scowcroft, Henry Kissinger, former US State Department Director of Policy Planning under President Obama Anne-Marie Slaughter, Madeleine Albright, MEK terrorist coddlers US Army General Wesley Clark and USMC General and former National Security Adviser under President Obama, James Jones, Neo-Cons Richard Armitage, Paula Dobriansky, Eric Edelman, James Woolsey, James Baker, Frank Carlucci, Colin Powell, Condoleezza  Rice, and George Shultz.


 


Images: The Atlantic Council – bi-partisan corporate-fascism, the ones who benefit as the rest of the world collapses. Its sponsors and board of directors are responsible for writing some of the darkest chapters in modern human history, transcending political parties, presidencies, and premierships. Accepting an award from such an organization is to be knighted by the forces of human oppression, disparity, and exploitation.
 




If readers are wondering why an alleged “Democrat” president is carrying out the wars and hegemonic foreign policy of his Neo-Conservative predecessor, a corporate-financier driven nexus like the Atlantic Council would be a good place to begin searching for the answers.
This was the council that guided and promoted the corporatist-military agenda in Libya, which oversaw the arming of vast legions of Al Qaeda-affiliated terrorists led by the US State Department(#29), UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf), and UN-listed terror organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), responsible for the death and sectarian bloodshed that ravaged Iraq throughout the US occupation, and most recently, the foreign-sponsored terror campaign ravaging Syria today.
The council’s corporate-financier sponsors have reaped billions upon billions in contracts as the West wages wars of conquest and expansion around the world.
Whether these wars are “successful” or not is inconsequential, because no matter how many American soldiers are killed or maimed, and no matter how drained America’s taxpayers become, the corporate-financiers always get their paycheck, their agendas always advanced.
The Atlantic Council and the National Endowment for Democracy are just two of many think-tank/lobbying fronts that represent the collective interests of the Fortune 500 of Wall Street and London. It is clear that if one wanted to go about making the world a better place, they would begin with a serious examination of the sponsorship of the Atlantic Council and NED, their sources of power, and how to undermine, boycott, and replace them entirely.
Surely, one would not step foot within the halls of any of these institutions, shake the bloodied hands of any of its many co-conspirators, let alone play part in one of their public relations charades.
However, that is exactly what one supposed “champion” of democracy and human rights has done – inexplicable unless of course this “champion” is nothing of the sort.
Aung San Suu Kyi – Fraud, Fascist, and Fool


 



Flanked by war criminals, corporate-fascists, and warmongers, Aung San Suu Kyi of Myanmar (still called by its British imperial nomenclature “Buma” by the Western press) toured Washington D.C. this month, showered with awards including the “Congressional Gold Medal,” and the Atlantic Council’s “Global Citizen Award.”





Suu Kyi would also provide a key address for the Neo-Conservative, corporate-fascist National Endowment for Democracy’s 2012 “Democracy Award” ceremony.
Images: The West’s recent “awards blitz” attempts to lend both themselves and Suu Kyi sorely needed legitimacy. Recently, Suu Kyi’s supporters have begun an ugly, genocidal-bigoted campaign to eliminate ethnic Rohingya’s from Myanmar. Suu Kyi has been complicity silent throughout the violence.
The LA Times would report in regard to Suu Kyi’s acceptance of the Congressional Gold Medal: I stand here strong in the knowledge that I am among friends, Suu Kyi said in the Capitol rotunda as she finally accepted the Congressional Gold Medal, which Congress awarded her in absentia in 2008 when she was still confined in Myanmar.
The charade continued with Senator John McCain, who has most recently conspired with Al Qaeda in the city of Benghazi, Libya and on the Turkish-Syrian border for a series of preplanned violent regime changes, claiming: I consider myself very fortunate to have lived to see this day and to know the people of Burma, whose dignity and rights Aung San Suu Kyi has sacrificed so much to defend, and will one day be free to live with dignity and justice and hope.
Myanmar, rich in natural resources, and with a large population ripe for exploitation, as well as strategically located in relations to the West’s strategy versus China, clearly represents an attractive target for the corporate-financier sponsors and representatives of both the National Endowment for Democracy and the Atlantic Council.
In reality then, all Suu Kyi is doing is assisting in the creation of US-funded institutions in Myanmar to create a US-backed political order to serve Western corporate-financier interests, just as the British had done to the nation at the height of the its empire, and as all empires have done throughout the ages.
Suu Kyi’s entire movement is in fact a creation of joint US-British funding, political, and covert support.
In “Myanmar (Burma) “Pro-Democracy” Movement a Creation of Wall Street & London,” it was documented that Suu Kyi and organizations supporting her, including local propaganda fronts like the New Era Journal, the Irrawaddy, and the Democratic Voice of Burma (DVB) radio, have received millions of dollars a year from the Neo-Conservative chaired National Endowment for Democracy,convicted criminal and Wall Street speculator George Soros’ Open Society Institute, and the US State Department itself, citing Britain’s own “Burma Campaign UK (.pdf).”




Image: The Myitsone Dam, on its way to being the 15th largest in the world until construction was halted in September by a campaign led by Wall Street-puppet Aung San Suu Kyi, a stable of US-funded NGOs, and a terrorist campaign executed by armed groups operating in Kachin State, Myanmar.


And not only does the US State Department in tandem with Western corporate media provide Aung San Suu Kyi extensive political, financial, and rhetorical backing, they provide operational capabilities as well, allowing her opposition movement to achieve Western objectives throughout Myanmar.
The latest achievement of this operational capability successfully blocked the development of Myanmar’s infrastructure by halting a joint China-Mynamar dam project that would have provided thousands of jobs, electricity, state-revenue, flood control, and enhanced river navigation for millions.
Suu Kyi and her supporting network of NGOs, as well as armed militants in Myanmar’s northern provinces conducted a coordinated campaign exploiting both “environmental” and “human rights” concerns that in reality resulted in Myanmar’s continual economic and social stagnation.
The ultimate goal of course is to effect regime change not only in Myanmar, but to create a united Southeast Asian front against China.
 As reported in June, 2011′s “Collapsing China,” as far back as 1997 there was talk about developing an effective containment strategy coupled with the baited hook of luring China into its place amongst the “international order.” Just as in these 1997 talking-points where author and notorious Neo-Con policy maker Robert Kagan described the necessity of using America’s Asian “allies” as part of this containment strategy, Clinton goes through a list of regional relationships the US is trying to cultivate to maintain “American leadership” in Asia.





Image: (Top) The “Lilliputians” though small in stature were collectively able to tie down the larger Gulliver from the literary classic “Gulliver’s Travels.” In the same manner, the US wants to use smaller Southeast Asian nations to “tie down” the larger China. (Bottom) From SSI’s 2006 “String of Pearls” report detailing a strategy of containment for China. While “democracy,” “freedom,” and “human rights” will mask the ascension of Aung San Suu Kyi and others into power, it is part of a region-wide campaign to overthrow nationalist elements and install client regimes in order to encircle and contain China.


Then certainly it makes sense to see Senator John McCain glowingly praise Aung San Suu Kyi and her “sacrifices,” when McCain’s agenda itself aims ultimately at encircling and destroying China, as well as Russia.
It was US Senator John McCain, chairman of the International Republican Institutewhich played a pivotal role in organizing the so-called “spontaneous” “Arab Spring,” who said in 2011of the unrest his IRI had helped fund in Egypt, “I would be a little less cocky in the Kremlin with my KGB cronies today if I were Vladimir Putin. I would be a little less secure in the seaside resort [of] President Hu and a few men who govern and decide the fate of 1.3 billion people.”
Suu Kyi, like so many before her, is either a willful accomplice, or drunk on the admiration and accolades ceaselessly bestowed upon her and is merely an expendable stepping stone for the West toward corporate-financier global hegemony, divorced entirely from any of the public rhetoric concerning “democracy” and “human rights.” Suu Kyi will be jettisoned if and when it is convenient for her sponsors to do so, and as history has shown, it is generally done in a very ungracious, often brutal manner.




Image: Hands up for recolonization and genocide. One of the US State Department’s favorite “activism 2.0″ gags is having activists write on their hands and photographing it to show solidarity for a cause across social media.


Aung San Suu Kyi (photo courtesy of Soros.org) herself promoted the recolonization of Myanmar by Western interests in this way. Ironically, her supporters who had used the tactic to support Suu Kyi and others in her movement, are now writing pro-genocide slogans on their hands.
Suu Kyi’s saintly persona has been recently betrayed by the rank and file of her movement, who have been revealed as genocidal, sectarian bigots now carrying out a nationwide campaign against ethnic Rohingya.
Suu Kyi’s supporters, like other Western proxies in Libya, Syria, and beyond, are indeed not the “pro-democratic,” “enlightened” forces they are portrayed as, and as their movement betrays decades of carefully crafted Western propaganda, Suu Kyi and her followers are quickly becoming liabilities rather than the celebrated assets they have long been.
This may in fact be why Suu Kyi has been slated for this public relations stunt in the first place – an attempt to salvage a faltering public image.
Suu Kyi is either a fool for believing the superficial rhetoric a demonstrably self-serving corporate-fascist agenda is selling her, or foolish to believe she can betray her people as an agent of foreign corporate-financier interests without consequence.
Regardless of her intentions, she is helping not only in the exploitation and oppression of her own people by foreign neo-imperial interests, but contributing to supranational meddling throughout Southeast Asia and the encirclement and destabilization of China. She is a facilitator against, not a champion for, human progress and world peace.
Whether her eyes can detect the blood covering the accolades she lines her shelves with or not, the blood is still there. If Aung San Suu Kyi cannot in good conscience end her associations with the bane of humanity, we, as humanity, cannot in good conscience support her or her agenda.
Her rhetoric is no different than that of Senator John McCain’s, spoken with nefarious interests just below the superficially appealing surface. Unlike McCain, she has managed to defraud millions of people both within Myanmar and around the world – thanks to the help of the BBC and Hollywood.
Suu Kyi is just one of many frauds facilitating the ambitions of the corporate-financier elite – but her example is perhaps the most transparent and illustrative in regards to how the corporate-financier elite operate, how they deceive and manipulate the masses with appealing narratives and charismatic personalities, and how they use the reputations and legitimacy of their institutions they themselves have created to sell their agenda of global domination as its very antithesis – as “freedom,” “democracy,” and “human rights.”



It is not the song, nor the dance, but it is the concept that we only need one
person to start or initiate, the rest will fall into place!

Share for friends and associates.





AUNG SAN SUU KYI: BURMA’S ROBERT MUGABE
By Roland Watson
March 19, 2013

Robert Mugabe is the dictator of Zimbabwe. It wasn’t always this way. Zimbabwe was formerly
a British colony, called Rhodesia. Mugabe in his younger years was a freedom fighter. He spent
ten years as a political prisoner. He led the Zimbabwe African National Union. In 1979, the
Rhodesia Bush War ended, and the following year he was elected Prime Minister. He remains in power, to this day. 
 
Mugabe was viewed as a hero. But as he aged he became autocratic, and determined not to yield his rule. Now in his fourth decade of power, Zimbabwe has suffered immeasurably, and is one of the least developed and most repressive nations in the world
 

3/13/2013

Rohingyar



A mixture of Bangali-Sanskrit-Rakhine languages in Rakhine [Arakan] State in the earlier time where people may have coined the word: 'Rooinga' or 'Ruïnga', or, literally and locally speaking, all Muslim in Rakhine State are referred to as Rooinga since 18th Century.

Rakhine State has a total population of [2010 est.] 3,836,000; and the ethnic diversity is: Rakhine, Kaman, Chin, and Islamic Bengalis.  The main religion in the area are: Theravada Buddhism, Islam, and Hinduism.
The Government of Burma do not have the habit of taking census on regular basis. In 2002 estimates, Rakhine State consists of four districts, showing areas and officially estimated populations: Sittwe [12,504 Sq km; 1,099,568 population]; Maungdaw [3,538 Sq km; 763,844 population]; Kyaukphyu [9,984 Sq km; 458,244 population]; Thandwe [10,753 Sq km; 296,736 people] - Total Rakhine State: 36,778 Sq km; with 2,915,000 total population. Combined, these districts have a total of 17 townships and 1,164 village-tracts. Sittwe is the modern day capital of the state.
The difference between 2002 estimates and 2010 estimates in the population statistics is: [3,836,000 - 2,915,000 = 921,000] which is something queer to make a note. Would the birth rate could be that high in 8 years' time span, 31.6% increased?

Rakhine was an independent kingdom until 1784-85 when the last Burmese Dynasty Konebaung invaded and dethroned the Rakhine King. With the Treaty of Yandabo {Rendezvous} [1826], which ended the first Anglo-Burmese War, Burma was forced to cede Rakhine [Arakan] along with Tanintharyi [Tenasserim] to British India. The British made Sittwe [Akyab] the capital of Rakhine. Later on, Rakhine became part of the province of Burma of the British Indian Empire, and then part of British Burma when Burma was made into a separate Crown Colony. Since then the influx of people from India into Burma, at that time Bangladesh had not existed, as yet,  was quite steady and continuous with no apparent hindrances.

According to the British statistics there were 30,000 Muslims in Rakhine State in 1825 but by 1930 Muslim population increased to 217,800, an increase of 626 %. Though alarming and forewarned the British Government ignored the potential racial conflicts and tensions.

The ethnic Rakhine is the majority. Rakhine  comprises [7] different ethnic  groups:  Rakhine, Kamein, Kwe Myi, Daingnet, Maramagyi, Mro, and Thet. The Rakhine reside mainly in the lowland valleys as well as Yam-byair and Mahn Aung islands. A number of other ethnic minorities like the Chin, Mro, Chakma, Khami, Dainet, Bangali and Maramagri inhabit mainly in the hill and northern regions of the state.

In such a small area ethnic diversity is quite high, so to speak, and the Rakhine, the native, and the Muslims - the new comers, especially, have never been gelled. The animosities between the two has always been high.
This small area could probably be dubbed as the Land of Detest; Rakhine Vs Muslims from the time way back in the history; and Rakhine dislike Burmese in their heart of hearts because not only Burmese dethroned their King, destroyed their Kingdom but stolen or misappropriated their most revered Buddha statues, Mahar Myat Muni from Rakhine to Burma after the military expedition. 
  
The quagmire Burma is facing at present is nothing new but partly responsible by the present day people that are populated in the Rakhine State, however, the Immigration, Army and Police officials are more responsible than the people. It was the British who had created all unexplainable and intricate problems not only to Burma but also for most parts of the world.

Burma's Population estimated in 2001 was 51 million; however, no census has been taken since 1983. Ethnic groups: Bama 68%, Shan 9%, Karen 7%, Arakanese 4%, Chinese 3%, Mon 2%, Indian 2%, other 5%; [many other smaller indigenous ethnic groups form a combined total of 30% of the population]. Religions: Buddhist 89%, Christian 4% [Baptist 3%, Roman Catholic 1%], Muslim 4%, animist 1%, other 2%.

Burma have Muslim since the first dynasty, i.e. Pagan Dynasty. A historical source pointed that Nga Yaman Karn [Mr. Rahman Khan], a playmate of the King Anawrahta's son was a Muslim. Nga Yaman tried to grab the State power but failed. Is Anawrahta a Burmese name? I doubt it. The Third King was Kyanzittha, what language and name was that; Chinese? In that lineage there was a King, by the name of Nara Thiha Patay. I can not decipher until I came across Marco Polo's Travelogue that mentioned the King Nara Thiha Patay as: Naram Sinham Patil; an Indian name!

At the same circa of Nga Yaman Karn's time we had two famous Indian Muslims in the Anawratha's Court: Byat Wi and Byat Ta. The younger brother Byat Ta served Anawrahta. According to the legion Byat Ta and an Olgress from Mount Poppa got two sons who also served in the Pagan Court. Later on the two young chaps were killed, but Anawratha, utilizing his Majestic prerogatives and power anointed them to be the Nats or Spirits and assigned an area called Taung Pyone to the two kids that were killed. The two Nats, Shwe Phyinn Nyi Naung are one of the most famous Nat Spirits in Burma that many people give their obeisance up to this time.      

We have Muslim in the last Burmese Kaung Baung Dynasty. Under the third last King, Pagan Min, the Mayor of the King's Naypyidor or the Capital City Amarapura was a Muslim by the known name of Bi-Sub [Khun Master, so to speak]. The real name was Sai Yet Khan, a notorious womanizer, rapist,  a crony, a legal dacoit and cock-fighting-mate of His Majesty the Pagan King.

We have Muslim in our Independence struggle. Mr. M. A. Raschid was a Muslim, was the President of the famous Rangoon University Student Union [RUSU] after U Nu in 1937, and had served as Minister in several portfolios beginning '50s until 1962. We had U Razark, a Muslim who was assassinated along with General Aung San on July 19, 1947. However, we do not have or never had Rhohingyar in Burma at all.
Burma have Mohammedans or Muslim; and the British brought in many Bengalis, or Chittagongians or Khor Taw Kalar as menial laborers to employ in the fishery and agricultural sectors and for Rangoon, as Municipal Laborers to clean up the city manure on daily basis. In those days even Rangoon, the capital city, did not have flush toilet; we only have Potty System.

Many Khor Taw were employed on Rhakine State's 80% of the arable land which was used for rice cultivation. Being so close to Bangladesh Chittagongians from Western Bengal of India fluxed into Rakhine State freely with no hindrance where life is much easier than their native towns and villages.

Boothidaung and Maungdorr area have become their concentrated areas and many prominent Muslims rubbed shoulders with the British Rajs. In the '30s a Muslim from that area by the name of Sultan Mahmut served as the Minister for Health in the British Governor's Executive Council for Burma.

After Independence Muslim of Rakhine State adopted a political idea, that was to have Muslim State, and their movement was known as Mujahidin as they claimed themselves as Mujahids. By 1952 there were about 2,000 Mujahid insurgents under arms in Rakhine State, and they controlled Rathedaung and Boothidaung. By 1953 Mujahid had smoked out to a mere 300 under Government's mopping up offensive.
  
Rakhine had 6 seats for the Lower House of Parliament after Independence. Rakhine or Arakanese National United Organization [ANUO] had won all 6 seats in consecutive elections. One of the MPs by the name of Sultan Mahmut, an independent MP from Bootheedaung-Maung Dor area or member of ANUO along with all Rakhine MPs solidly voted for Nu-Tin faction in Parliament at the time Non-confidence motion was submitted by the splinter AFPFL faction led by U Ba Swe and U Kyaw Nyein in 1956. U Nu did not courted the Rakhine MPs to gain votes but the Rakhine MPs found U Nu to be more amicable to them and voted for him. Non-confidence debaters were defeated. 

The term Rhohingyar came into use in the '50s by the educated Bangali residents from the Mayu Frontier Area. The term cannot be found in any historical source or documents in any language before then. However, migration to and fro between Rakhine and Bengal had taken place, for example, between 1784-1824 Rakhine was under Burmese rule and Rakhine were ruthlessly suppressed and therefore there were about 35,000 Rakhine fled to Chittagong District in British India. Even now there are Rakhine villages in Bangladesh.

Rakhine nationalism and Muslims's political fervor in Rakhine to form an independent Rakhine State and Muslim State respectively is brewing from the very beginning Burma came into existence as an independent country.  

Rakine leader U Seinda, on April 1, 1947 at an All Arakan Conference, with a fervent support of Thakin Soe's Red Flag Communist Party declared Bogyoke Aung San as an opportunist and later on joined the rebellion. Another Arankanese, U Hla Tun Pru at a Meeting in Rangoon demanded to form 'Arakanistan' for the Arakanese people.

Under the guise of Jihad Muslim Moulovis encouraged people in the remote area to commit banditry, arson, and rapes after January 1948. Mujahid, a prelude to Rhohingyar, started Muslim Liberation Organization [MLO] in March 1946, under the leadership of Chittagongian Zaffar Kawal. By May 1948  a conference was held in Garabyin Village, Maungdor District and the Mujahid Party was formed. Some arms were brought in from Chittagong area. Kawal became the Commander in Chief and his Lieutenant was Abdul Husein, a former police corporal from the Akyab District.

Dated June 9, 1948 Mujahid Party, in Urdur, sent a seven point letter to the Government of the Union of Burma; at the time U Nu was Prime Minister, demanding [only the two prominent demand are included in this study]:

1. Area between the west bank of Kaladan River and the east bank of Naaf River be recognized as the National Home of the Muslim in Burma;
2. Muslims in Arakan must be accepted as the nationalities of Burma.

U Nu's Government, I believe, did not even respond to the demand.

Burmese or Arakanese do not have much qualms of peaceful co-existence with Muslim, or Hindu or Chinese though they all are foreigners. But, the Muslims are variably different from other foreigners that came and dwelled on our land. Unlike other nationalities they married Burmese-Buddhist girls, converted them, and for that matter they were urged and supported by the foreign organizations. That behavior is one of the main crux of the problems. Blaming Buddhist monks is quite unfair and unfounded because as monks and as Buddhist it is their fervent religious responsibility to prevent the 'conversion' of Buddhists into other religion.

This particular ethnic group would not satisfy with their peaceful 'permanent stay' status, for example, they have to be known as the 'Muslims of Arakan' and had to declare 'Urdur' is their language; and when their demands were ignored the Mujahids destroyed villages in the northern part of Maungdor Township. On July 19, 1948 Mujahids attacked Ngapruchaung and villages in the Maungdor Township and the Buddhist monks, the most revered highest order in the Buddhist hierarchy were kidnapped and asked for ransom.

On July 15, 1951 All Arakan Muslim Conference was held for two days at Alethangyaw Village and published: The Charter of the Constitutional Demands of the Arakani Muslims; in which 'the balance of power between the Muslim and the Arankanese, two major races of Arakan, [where] north Arakan should be immediately formed a free Muslim State as equal constituent Member of the Union of Burma like the Shan State, the Kareni State, the Chin Hills, and the Kachin Zone with its own Militia, Police and Security Forces under the General Command of the Union.' Such behavior of any ethnic group is unfit to be part and parcel of the Union. 

Up until to this juncture Muslims are addressing themselves as Muslims of Arakan. For the first time the word Rhohingyar appeared in the annals of Burma was in the Guardian Daily newspaper on August 20, 1951 in an article 'The Sudeten Muslims' written by an MP from Boothidaung. However, when U Nu's Clean AFPFL Government introduced the Bill to form Mon and Rakhine States in the Parliament in 1960 Muslim MPs from Boothidaung, and Maungdor Townships not only objected but denounced the Bill and demanded for the establishment of Rhohingyar State.

Political scenario of Burma changed after 1962 coup. After massive nationalization of 1964 under Ne Win's dictatorial military regime over 100,000 Indians and over 12,000 Pakistanis left Burma for good. But, the Muslims that were engaged in the agricultural sector in the northern Arakan State were not affected since they were issued with National Registration Cards.

In 1973 when a referendum for the new constitution was implemented under the Revolutionary Council Muslims from Mayu Frontier submitted a proposal that a separate Muslim State or at the very least a Division be created. May be, as the result, in 1974 election, Muslim, mostly Bengalis from Mayu Frontier were denied the right to elect their representatives to the Lower House of Parliament.

On July 15, 1972 with the arms and ammunition flowed in from Bangladesh an All Party Rhohingyar Congress was held at the Bangladesh-Burma Border and called for Rhohingyar National Liberation.

Under 1982 Citizenship Law citizenship was granted to those who had or who could prove that their ancestors had lived in Burma before the First Anglo-Burmese War in 1824. Thus many Muslim became aliens in Rakhine State. However, 24.3 % were categorized as Muslims and 67.8 % were categorized as Arakans in Rakhine State as reported by the Immigration and Manpower Dept in 1987.

Though the Arakan-Muslim problem was brought in by the British it would be quite incomplete if we omit the myopic Burmese authorities at the Bangladeshi-Burma Border who have the discretionary arbitrary power in issuing the National Registration Cards. Newly minted young Immigration Officer or well seasoned Immigration Officers regarded the posting to the Bangladesh-Burma Border as winning the State Lottery multiply. Thus Rakhine State have many Muslim illegal immigrants or the Border Crossers, uncontrollably through bribery. The rates in Kyat for legalization of illegal Border Crosser: State Level Officer Kyat 1,000,000; Township Level Officer Kyat 300,000 to 500,000; and Group Level Officer Kyat 10,000 to 15,000.    

Burmese do not have much qualms for peaceful co-existence with Chinese or with Muslim as long as the new comers assimilated into the existing traditions and customs where they could keep their religious rites and ritual and building Communal Temple - Joss-houses, or, Mosques.

However, if any ethno-politico group demands for separate, and special preferential treatment, and at the same time raping local damsels here and there, and or, offering special monetary rewards for converting Burmese Buddhist damsels into their religion will always be the cause of troubles, not necessarily racial and ethnic tension or cleansing. Those acts of unnecessary ultra sensitive demands will be looked upon as 'Looking for Trouble'.

Allowing to use the name Rhohingyar over the Burma Broadcasting Services did not construe the recognition as an new entity in the Union. If the existing ethnic Muslims wants to call themselves as Rhohingyra or whatever the existing Government may allow it to be called that way. But, if the name is used as a political banner by any ethno-politico group no Government will ever allow such an endeavor. In every country there is Immigration Law concerning Citizenship. Citizenship comes in some cases naturally and in some cases need application. Rakhine State quagmire can be solved only if both races, Arakan and Muslims accept peaceful coexistence. That will not be that difficult if one race does not rape the women from other race and if retaliation occur, recourse to law and order, not burning down other peoples' houses and kill unnecessarily.

My concluding remark is that the culprits who brought in or allows illegal Bengalis need to find scapegoat especially at the time several Bengalis as well as Rakhine were killed and the Rakhine riot became an international concern.

The culprits found the scapegoat in U Nu. The improper propaganda was used by the suckers, especially the Westerners and the Western Media, who always want to show off their knowledge of the world that they do not understand fully well. Time and again, this line of propaganda was used against U Nu.

If one study thoroughly, the statistics will prove that the propaganda was nothing but a distorted information.

U Aung
March 2, 2013.

တီးမယ္

PALI ZI. CHAU’ CHE’ PALI OU: GYI PALI ZI. NJAN: HSIN

PALI ZI. CHAU’ CHE’  PALI OU: GYI  PALI ZI. NJAN: HSIN
[Stuff and nonsense – lies] [Wheeler, one who deceives in an endearing way] [Using deceits as scaffolding]

Maung Thar Kyaw

The Statement, dated October 30th, and with the Place mentioned as: Sane Lai Kan Thar, the name of the State Guest House: ‘from 13:00 to 13:55 Daw Aung San Su Kyi [ASSK] came to see Union Minister U Aung Kyi, as she was invited by the Government of the Republic of Myanmar’ was issued.

At the Meeting the discussion dwelled on the situation where ‘the State is providing necessary assistances [meaning Constitution Amendments, for example, I guess]; and, in order to have economic development views on the importance of freedom of trade, and free circulation of currencies were also discussed’. And also, ‘the progress of the State’s undertakings to obtain perpetual peace initiatives with ethnic armed groups and the people that should be included in the amnesty were discussed’. Meetings in the future shall convene is agreed.

Details of the entire Meeting were not disclosed, as usual. This is the fourth time such Meeting had taken place.

After the Third Meeting between the two factions the Statement mentioned that the President was considering Amnesty, to join hands in controlling the flow of the Irrawaddy River, to bring in into legal folds of the people who are undergoing armed rebellion; and peace and rule of law were discussed.

After meeting with Aung Kyi twice ASSK met the President Thein Sein in August in Naypyidor. Soon afterward, over 200 so-called political prisoners were released under Amnesty Order. So-called political prisoner because the Governing clique consistently mentioned there is no political prisoners in Myanmar though there are plenty. There is some truth in the government’s claim that there is no political prisoner because no one was arrested under political issues but rather on criminal charges - for example: currency law, or disturbing public tranquility, etc.

ASSK met with Aung Kyi nine times under the previous military government but there was no substantive result whatsoever came out.

The Government came into existence on January 31, 2011 under the caption of the Government of the Republic of Myanmar with its President elected by the Union Parliament, a former military officer General Thein Sein. Many opinionated this General is a Dove – a soft liner, and his Deputy President Thiha Thura Tin Aung Myint Oo [Shit Loane], another ex-General is a Hawk – a hard liner; all baloney; they all are one liner, i.e. for the prosperity and welfare of the Armed Forces, meaning the top and upper echelon of the Army, under the guise of democracy.

New Guise needs, of course, new format and that new format is what the new government is formatting or formatted by the military junta before the State Power was transferred and implementing it as planned. Whether former SG Than Shwe is pulling the string from behind or is he still involved in day to day affairs are all irrelevant, though his State managed private office near Oatparta Thati Pagoda in Naypyidor is hooked with Online TV honing in onto the proceedings of the Union Parliament. He knows or he is privy to know who is behaving or misbehaving in the Union Parliament but whether he is watching the TV is something yet to be known or playing his favorite games.

The Executive, Judiciary, and Legislature were formed and on March 30th the State Power was transferred; the military junta SPDC was dissolved. The Ministry of Interior had given warnings to NLD Chairman Aung Shwe and Secretary ASSK in the last week of June to stop all its political activities as NLD is no political party according to the Party Registration Law of the Union Election Commission. The Ministry warning emphatically mentioned that NLD’s actions were intentionally motivated against the Law.

On top of that Union Election Commission had warned with a letter dated April 5th to all 37 Registered Political Parties not to communicate with illegal political entities. Presumably, political circles as well as diplomatic community considered the warning was directed towards NDL.

Though the new government’s changing color is visible it is still noticeably unruly. The disregards of public opinions as well as international barrages remain as the hallmark of the Thein Sein’s Administration.

Disregarding its own Ministry’s Order Thein Sein allowed Minister Aung Kyi to parley with ASSK and even invited her to Naypyidor and received her exclusively where all political leaders from the Registered Political Parties are treated shabbily at the same occasion.

The Constitution was amended proposed by the Union Election Commission regarding the Membership where criminals cannot be party members or a political entity cannot register if its members are serving criminals. That phrase has now been erased for the sake of NLD. That amendment had made eased NLD to avoid the issue of abandoning its own jailed members when and if they apply for Party Registration.

The antagonistic political ogres of Burma are, on the visual body politics, in cordial relationship. One is, up to recent past, enjoyed full support of China and now trying its best to veer off to get into the western orbit. The other ogre has, from the very beginning to present, receives consistent and absolute no-matter-what support from the western camp. It has four Radio stations providing overwhelming support in high volume of propaganda just for one person, viz. Radio Free Asia and Voice of America [two US outfits], BBC [British outfit], and Democratic Voice of Burma [EU outfit] beaming into Burma where people are socket in with one line to support, day in and day out, every day. This ogre is the western group’s horse of Burma and Thein Sein Administration wants to ride along with that horse to the winning post. Is consistent propping up necessitate a leader to become an icon? Yes, it is, at least in Burma, it has been proven!

Within a couple of days NLD will decide whether to register and the outcome is quite predictable: ‘if ASSK is promised to contest in the upcoming By-election then NLD will allow to Register by ASSK regardless of party or public opinion’. Does it mean: ‘if she is not allowed to contest in the upcoming By-election’ then NLD will not be permitted to register by ASSK? Quite likely so, as all the past behaviors indicated that: ‘person is superior to policy’, and the ‘party is dispensable’.

So far, there is no knowledge that the outcome of the Aung Kyi-Su Kyi Meeting had agreed whether ASSK will be allowed to contest in the election. If that is the case the amendment of the constitution will be a major issue. At the end of the day, one faction will sure to swallow the other like python. No on

e knows, which one will come out as the python and which one is Mai Dwe Lay.

Maung Thar Kyaw

Taiwan, November 3, 2011.



OUR COUNTRY -----

Burmese society is unique. With extended family system Burmese are laid back, or rather happy go lucky.
Sayar-Dagar relationship, or, the bond between the Sanghas and laymen is deep rooted and has been part of the culture from the time immemorial.
Elderly people spend time at pagodas or the monasteries sharing merits or family gossip, or whatever, and, that is how, unlike the Western society, members of the Burmese society do not need much of psychiatrists’ assistance.
Quiet time, alone, communicating with the Lord Buddha is part and parcel of our heritage we all enjoy tremendously. Visiting pagodas had never needed permission from the authorities.

see all

http://uk.geocities.com/kabarmakyay/Our_Country.pdf

Are these happening in Burma!

As long as one enriches him/her-self in the decadences the sky is the limit, as the junta would not bother them, that’s the saying goes in present context of Burma.
Thinzar Win, a Model, could do pretty well on Catwalk and other walks such as Burmanization of Bikini, for example. Just kicked off the blouse and the jeans and leave only bra and the underwear, that becomes Bikini, as simple as that. Look!

Here she is, Thinzar Win, on the right.

Could you still think you are looking at Burmese girls who are posting for this photo in Rangoon? If you think the junta is to be blamed for all decadent aspects, then, your thinking may be inconclusive.

Shwedarling.com, a website for dating and mating prevails in today’s Burma. In 1988 no one could dream that Burma would be at this stage today but it has advanced so fast and so vast.

Infested with nouveau riche in the ngathalau’ economy decadences are abound; instead of tea break at usual hour at or around 4:00 PM now the nouveau riche have new past time at 3:30 PM or so – “Time to squeeze Pau’ Si” at Karaoke bars that are mushrooming through out Burma!

Junta’s policies may have pushed urbanites to that corner but it is just a plain excuse. Getting along by going along is a sin, by all means.

Here is another exhibit to think of!

Moe Hay Ko, another Model, good at Catwalk as well as other walks – bed walk [?] smooching somewhere in the quiet corner!
These girls really have come out of Burmese cocoon – hi ri. u’ ta’ pa. [Shame and fear of sinning] for sure.

Mind you dear reader – the decaying culture of the people is unfathomable, especially the urbanites, the sponsors of such decadences, and, contemplate what reforms would be needed for our beloved country. Mind you, the tiger would never change into vegetarian out of pity for animals!

Salamani Kantchalar!

Burma was under absolute monarchy from 1044 AD until 1885 AD and was under different dynasties. The Monarchs yearned to possess White Elephant; i.e. to claim as the Owner of the White Elephant or Sin Phyu Shin, or, if they have more than one White Elephant, then, Sin Phyu Myarr Shin!

One White Elephant-crazy king even commanded to retrieve a dead elephant floated down the river that had resemblances of White Elephant and kept in his palace and claimed he was the Sin Phuy Shin.

White Elephant is considered to represent the power and glory of the Owner and the White Elephant would appear, according to the myth, only if the Ruler of the country has strong Power and Glory.

Burma has dictators since 1962: viz. Ne Win, Saw Maung, Than Shwe; and, all of them seem to believe that they were the royalty somehow or other. The last dynasty, Koane Baung, ended with His Majesty King Thibaw. The prophecy had it that there would be 13 Koane Baung kings to reign Burma. Thibaw was the 11th and two more kings are yet to reign. Ne Win presumed he was the 12th Koane Baung King! Saw Maung seemed to have believed that he was the reincarnation of King Kyan Sit Tharr of the Pagan Dynasty, and, Than Shwe believes he was the reincarnation of King Thar Lun.

During Thar Lun Than Shwe’s reign, a White Elephant was sited in the jungle of Rakhine State. With pomp and pageantry the White Elephant was brought to Rangoon, the then Nay Pyi Daw and kept in the highly decorated pavilion that befits only to the royalty with special elephant guards, etc., so on and so forth. All the necessary arrangements were carried out by MI and its Chief Lt. Gen. Khin Nyunt who believes he was the reincarnation of Bayint Naung of Taungngoo Dynasty, though he never got to the top most spot of the junta’s ivory tower. The propaganda mill was fanning at high speed that the current rulers of Burma have highly auspicious power and glory so much so that the White Elephant was presented by the Nats [Resplendent being worthy of veneration].

Within a few months after the White Elephant had settled in at the newly built pavilion a Bangladeshi, or, to be more exact, a Chittagonian, or better known in Burma as Khortaw Kalar showed up at the Bangladeshi Embassy in Rangoon, claiming that the elephant at the Pavilion was his elephant that was herded away by the Burmese while grazing in the jungle and requested the Bangladeshi Ambassador to reclaim the elephant from the Burmese junta on his behalf. To cut the story short the Ambassador along with the Officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and MI officers went to the Pavilion with the Khortaw Kalar and demanded to prove his claim.

There, Khortaw Kalar stepped out and bellowed: Salamani Kantchalar!

At the very instant the ‘Command’ was heard the White Elephant lifted up his trunk and trumpeted a very loud noise. The ‘Command’ was given for the second time and the White Elephant responded in the same manner again. Then, Khortaw Kalar commanded in more Khortaw words: the White Elephant was under complete spell of commands – sitting, kneeling, etc. Now, the claim was proven to be true and the negotiation was but started. MI ended up paying US $ 100,000.00 from the State coffer as demanded by the Khortaw Kalar for the White Elephant that was supposed to have been presented by the Nats due to the power and glory of the rulers of Burma.

Khortaw did not stop then and there. He added there are four more such elephants in his possession and they were up for sale if the price is right. MI arranged a delegation to accompany the Khortaw to his native village in the no-man’s land between Bangladesh and Burma to inspect the so called White Elephants. There, the delegation found two more White Elephants out of the four and agreed to pay US$ 200,000 a piece.

Burmese delegation could not just take the two elephants away they bought; they need the Khortaw to release the two in the Rakhine jungle for them to herd them back to Burma later as though it was naturally sited. Thus, the usurper royalties of Burma got three White Elephants at a price of US $ 500,000.

Some one got excited regarding the Salamani Kantchalar and traced back how it came into existence! In the anal of Burma there was a time when a Shan Prince by the name of Sao Han Pha, better known as Tho Han Bwa reigned Burma. He was a tyrant by all means; conceited and insolent, and very much anti-Buddhist religion. During his rein many Monks were tortured, killed and extradited to far away places and forced them from learning Buddhist scripture. Tho Han Bwa was the Daman daye [impediment endangering the teachings of Buddha] of his time. Under Tho Han Bwa, some aspects of Buddhist incantations had changed; for example: Buddhan Tharanan Gitsarmi, Dhaman Tharanan Gitsarmi but Sanghan Tharanan was turned into Gunsarmi, and Buddhan Puzaymi, Dhaman Puzaymi, and Sangan had turned into Pu-Jail-mi, just like recent events under Daman daye Thar Lun Than Shwe.

Many Burmese fled to far away places, including Burma-Bangladesh border to fight back Tho Han Bwa and/or other tyrants. There, they deployed Khortaws to attend their elephants. Khortaws were taught to learn ‘Commands’ in Burmese but it was very difficult for the Khortaws to learn the necessary commands for the elephants. By virtue of wits a Burmese gave a ‘battle command or a battle cry’ for the elephants: “Sarr Lho. Ma Nyee Kanazoe Thee”, in rhyme with the actual command. That, Khortaw could learn with not much difficulty. As the time woes on the command Sarr Lho. Ma Nyee Kanazoe Thee had resonance into Salamani Kantchalar!

Ne Win who presumed to be the 12th Koane Baung, Saw Maung who presumed to be the reincarnation of King Kyan Sit Tharr of the Pagan Dynasty, and the cagey sly fox Khin Nyunt who believes he was the reincarnation of Bayint Naung of Taungngoo Dynasty had all but ended badly. Now we have to see how Than Shwe who believes he was the reincarnation of King Thar Lun ended? Is it to believe that those who sit on such chairs excrete such excreta?

As a matter of fact, the real Owner of the White Elephants or the Sin Phyu Myarr Shin actually was the Khortaw Kalar of Bangladesh!

By the way,
All the Usurpers,
Ne Win, Saw Maung, Than Shwe are mere “Suu Yauts”!

bX-31gb9w